lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change the calculation of next pstate
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:59:42AM +0300, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/05/2014 10:34 μμ, Yuyang Du wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:30:03PM +0300, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> >> On 09/05/2014 05:56 μμ, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> >>
> >> Next performance state = min_perf + (max_perf - min_perf) * load / 100
> >>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This formula is fundamentally broken. You need to associate the load with its
> > frequency.
>
> Could you please explain why is it broken? I think the load should be
> independent from the current frequency.

Why independent? The load not (somewhat) determined by that?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-13 06:41    [W:0.660 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site