Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 May 2014 11:34:43 +0800 | From | Michael wang <> | Subject | [ISSUE] sched/cgroup: Does cpu-cgroup still works fine nowadays? |
| |
During our testing, we found that the cpu.shares doesn't work as expected, the testing is:
X86 HOST: 12 CPU GUEST(KVM): 6 VCPU
We create 3 GUEST, each with 1024 shares, the workload inside them is:
GUEST_1: dbench 6 GUEST_2: stress -c 6 GUEST_3: stress -c 6
So by theory, each GUEST will got (1024 / (3 * 1024)) * 1200% == 400% according to the group share (3 groups are created by virtual manager on same level, and they are the only groups heavily running in system).
Now if only GUEST_1 running, it got 300% CPU, which is 1/4 of the whole CPU resource.
So when all 3 GUEST running concurrently, we expect:
GUEST_1 GUEST_2 GUEST_3 CPU% 300% 450% 450%
That is the GUEST_1 got the 300% it required, and the unused 100% was shared by the rest group.
But the result is:
GUEST_1 GUEST_2 GUEST_3 CPU% 40% 580% 580%
GUEST_1 failed to gain the CPU it required, and the dbench inside it dropped a lot on performance.
So is this results expected (I really do not think so...)?
Or that imply the cpu-cgroup got some issue to be fixed?
Any comments are welcomed :)
Regards, Michael Wang
| |