Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:40:57 +0200 | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] ext4 changes for 3.15 | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:25:30PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > maintainers would have no idea that a new syscall has been added. >> >> If i386 has the new syscall, scripts/checksyscalls.sh will catch it and >> inform us about it during our next kernel build. >> >> If you add it to x86_64 only, bad luck for anyone else ;-) > > Maybe we should change scripts/checksyscalls.sh to check the x86_64 > list of syscalls, and not i386? > > It's been a long time since "all the world's an i386" --- these days, > it's "all the world's an x86_64". :-)
Let the kbuild people (and their employers) fight over it...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |