lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: sched_{set,get}attr() manpage
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:25:10AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 02:20:29PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > If your could take another pass though your existing text, to incorporate the
> > new flags stuff, and then send a page to me + linux-man@
> > that would be great.
>
>
> Sorry, this slipped my mind. An updated version below. Heavy borrowing
> from SCHED_SETSCHEDULER(2) as before.
>
> ---
>
> NAME
> sched_setattr, sched_getattr - set and get scheduling policy/attributes
>
> SYNOPSIS
> #include <sched.h>
>
> struct sched_attr {
> u32 size;
> u32 sched_policy;
> u64 sched_flags;
>
> /* SCHED_NORMAL, SCHED_BATCH */
> s32 sched_nice;
> /* SCHED_FIFO, SCHED_RR */
> u32 sched_priority;
> /* SCHED_DEADLINE */
> u64 sched_runtime;
> u64 sched_deadline;
> u64 sched_period;
> };
> int sched_setattr(pid_t pid, const struct sched_attr *attr, unsigned int flags);
>
> int sched_getattr(pid_t pid, const struct sched_attr *attr, unsigned int size, unsigned int flags);
>
> DESCRIPTION
> sched_setattr() sets both the scheduling policy and the
> associated attributes for the process whose ID is specified in
> pid. If pid equals zero, the scheduling policy and attributes
> of the calling process will be set. The interpretation of the
> argument attr depends on the selected policy. Currently, Linux
> supports the following "normal" (i.e., non-real-time) scheduling
> policies:
>
> SCHED_OTHER the standard "fair" time-sharing policy;
>
> SCHED_BATCH for "batch" style execution of processes; and
>
> SCHED_IDLE for running very low priority background jobs.
>
> The following "real-time" policies are also supported, for

why the "'s?

> special time-critical applications that need precise control
> over the way in which runnable processes are selected for
> execution:
>
> SCHED_FIFO a first-in, first-out policy;
>
> SCHED_RR a round-robin policy; and
>
> SCHED_DEADLINE a deadline policy.
>
> The semantics of each of these policies are detailed below.
>
> sched_attr::size must be set to the size of the structure, as in
> sizeof(struct sched_attr), if the provided structure is smaller
> than the kernel structure, any additional fields are assumed
> '0'. If the provided structure is larger than the kernel
> structure, the kernel verifies all additional fields are '0' if
> not the syscall will fail with -E2BIG.
>
> sched_attr::sched_policy the desired scheduling policy.
>
> sched_attr::sched_flags additional flags that can influence
> scheduling behaviour. Currently as per Linux kernel 3.14:
>
> SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK - resets the scheduling policy
> to: (struct sched_attr){ .sched_policy = SCHED_OTHER, }
> on fork().
>
> is the only supported flag.
>
> sched_attr::sched_nice should only be set for SCHED_OTHER,
> SCHED_BATCH, the desired nice value [-20,19], see NICE(2).
>
> sched_attr::sched_priority should only be set for SCHED_FIFO,
> SCHED_RR, the desired static priority [1,99].
>
> sched_attr::sched_runtime
> sched_attr::sched_deadline
> sched_attr::sched_period should only be set for SCHED_DEADLINE
> and are the traditional sporadic task model parameters.
>
> The flags argument should be 0.
>
> sched_getattr() queries the scheduling policy currently applied
> to the process identified by pid. If pid equals zero, the
> policy of the calling process will be retrieved.
>
> The size argument should reflect the size of struct sched_attr
> as known to userspace. The kernel fills out sched_attr::size to
> the size of its sched_attr structure. If the user provided
> structure is larger, additional fields are not touched. If the
> user provided structure is smaller, but the kernel needs to
> return values outside the provided space, the syscall will fail
> with -E2BIG.
>
> The flags argument should be 0.

What about SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FOR?

> The other sched_attr fields are filled out as described in
> sched_setattr().
>
> Scheduling Policies
> The scheduler is the kernel component that decides which runnable
> process will be executed by the CPU next. Each process has an associ‐
> ated scheduling policy and a static scheduling priority, sched_prior‐
> ity; these are the settings that are modified by sched_setscheduler().
> The scheduler makes it decisions based on knowledge of the scheduling
> policy and static priority of all processes on the system.

Isn't this last sentence redundant/sliglhtly repetitive?

> For processes scheduled under one of the normal scheduling policies
> (SCHED_OTHER, SCHED_IDLE, SCHED_BATCH), sched_priority is not used in
> scheduling decisions (it must be specified as 0).
>
> Processes scheduled under one of the real-time policies (SCHED_FIFO,
> SCHED_RR) have a sched_priority value in the range 1 (low) to 99
> (high). (As the numbers imply, real-time processes always have higher
> priority than normal processes.) Note well: POSIX.1-2001 only requires
> an implementation to support a minimum 32 distinct priority levels for
> the real-time policies, and some systems supply just this minimum.
> Portable programs should use sched_get_priority_min(2) and
> sched_get_priority_max(2) to find the range of priorities supported for
> a particular policy.
>
> Conceptually, the scheduler maintains a list of runnable processes for
> each possible sched_priority value. In order to determine which
> process runs next, the scheduler looks for the nonempty list with the
> highest static priority and selects the process at the head of this
> list.
>
> A process's scheduling policy determines where it will be inserted into
> the list of processes with equal static priority and how it will move
> inside this list.
>
> All scheduling is preemptive: if a process with a higher static prior‐
> ity becomes ready to run, the currently running process will be pre‐
> empted and returned to the wait list for its static priority level.
> The scheduling policy only determines the ordering within the list of
> runnable processes with equal static priority.
>
> SCHED_DEADLINE: Sporadic task model deadline scheduling
> SCHED_DEADLINE is an implementation of GEDF (Global Earliest
> Deadline First) with additional CBS (Constant Bandwidth Server).
> The CBS guarantees that tasks that over-run their specified
> budget are throttled and do not affect the correct performance
> of other SCHED_DEADLINE tasks.
>
> SCHED_DEADLINE tasks will fail FORK(2) with -EAGAIN
>
> Setting SCHED_DEADLINE can fail with -EINVAL when admission
> control tests fail.

Perhaps add a note about the deadline-class having higher priority than the
other classes; i.e. if a deadline-task is runnable, it will preempt any
other SCHED_(RR|FIFO) regardless of priority?

> SCHED_FIFO: First In-First Out scheduling
> SCHED_FIFO can only be used with static priorities higher than 0, which
> means that when a SCHED_FIFO processes becomes runnable, it will always
> immediately preempt any currently running SCHED_OTHER, SCHED_BATCH, or
> SCHED_IDLE process. SCHED_FIFO is a simple scheduling algorithm with‐
> out time slicing. For processes scheduled under the SCHED_FIFO policy,
> the following rules apply:
>
> * A SCHED_FIFO process that has been preempted by another process of
> higher priority will stay at the head of the list for its priority
> and will resume execution as soon as all processes of higher prior‐
> ity are blocked again.
>
> * When a SCHED_FIFO process becomes runnable, it will be inserted at
> the end of the list for its priority.
>
> * A call to sched_setscheduler() or sched_setparam(2) will put the
> SCHED_FIFO (or SCHED_RR) process identified by pid at the start of
> the list if it was runnable. As a consequence, it may preempt the
> currently running process if it has the same priority.
> (POSIX.1-2001 specifies that the process should go to the end of the
> list.)
>
> * A process calling sched_yield(2) will be put at the end of the list.

How about the recent discussion regarding sched_yield(). Is this correct?

lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.02.1403312333100.14882@ionos.tec.linutronix.de

Is this the correct place to add a note explaining te potentional pitfalls
using sched_yield?

> No other events will move a process scheduled under the SCHED_FIFO pol‐
> icy in the wait list of runnable processes with equal static priority.
>
> A SCHED_FIFO process runs until either it is blocked by an I/O request,
> it is preempted by a higher priority process, or it calls
> sched_yield(2).
>
> SCHED_RR: Round Robin scheduling
> SCHED_RR is a simple enhancement of SCHED_FIFO. Everything described
> above for SCHED_FIFO also applies to SCHED_RR, except that each process
> is only allowed to run for a maximum time quantum. If a SCHED_RR
> process has been running for a time period equal to or longer than the
> time quantum, it will be put at the end of the list for its priority.
> A SCHED_RR process that has been preempted by a higher priority process
> and subsequently resumes execution as a running process will complete
> the unexpired portion of its round robin time quantum. The length of
> the time quantum can be retrieved using sched_rr_get_interval(2).

-> Default is 0.1HZ ms

This is a question I get form time to time, having this in the manpage
would be helpful.

> SCHED_OTHER: Default Linux time-sharing scheduling
> SCHED_OTHER can only be used at static priority 0. SCHED_OTHER is the
> standard Linux time-sharing scheduler that is intended for all pro‐
> cesses that do not require the special real-time mechanisms. The
> process to run is chosen from the static priority 0 list based on a
> dynamic priority that is determined only inside this list. The dynamic
> priority is based on the nice value (set by nice(2) or setpriority(2))
> and increased for each time quantum the process is ready to run, but
> denied to run by the scheduler. This ensures fair progress among all
> SCHED_OTHER processes.
>
> SCHED_BATCH: Scheduling batch processes
> (Since Linux 2.6.16.) SCHED_BATCH can only be used at static priority
> 0. This policy is similar to SCHED_OTHER in that it schedules the
> process according to its dynamic priority (based on the nice value).
> The difference is that this policy will cause the scheduler to always
> assume that the process is CPU-intensive. Consequently, the scheduler
> will apply a small scheduling penalty with respect to wakeup behaviour,
> so that this process is mildly disfavored in scheduling decisions.
>
> This policy is useful for workloads that are noninteractive, but do not
> want to lower their nice value, and for workloads that want a determin‐
> istic scheduling policy without interactivity causing extra preemptions
> (between the workload's tasks).
>
> SCHED_IDLE: Scheduling very low priority jobs
> (Since Linux 2.6.23.) SCHED_IDLE can only be used at static priority
> 0; the process nice value has no influence for this policy.
>
> This policy is intended for running jobs at extremely low priority
> (lower even than a +19 nice value with the SCHED_OTHER or SCHED_BATCH
> policies).
>
> RETURN VALUE
> On success, sched_setattr() and sched_getattr() return 0. On
> error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately.
>
> ERRORS
> EINVAL The scheduling policy is not one of the recognized policies,
> param is NULL, or param does not make sense for the policy.
>
> EPERM The calling process does not have appropriate privileges.
>
> ESRCH The process whose ID is pid could not be found.
>
> E2BIG The provided storage for struct sched_attr is either too
> big, see sched_setattr(), or too small, see sched_getattr().

Where's the EBUSY? It can throw this from __sched_setscheduler() when it
checks if there's enough bandwidth to run the task.

>
> NOTES
> While the text above (and in SCHED_SETSCHEDULER(2)) talks about
> processes, in actual fact these system calls are thread specific.


--
Henrik Austad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-09 18:01    [W:0.150 / U:2.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site