Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:55:22 -0700 | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Use an alternative to _PAGE_PROTNONE for _PAGE_NUMA v2 | From | Linus Torvalds <> |
| |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote: > > I picked a solution. The posted series uses a different bit.
Yes, and I actually like that. I have nothing against your patch series. I'm ranting and raving because you then seemed to say "maybe we shouldn't pick a solution after all" when you said:
> > If you are ok with leaving _PAGE_NUMA as _PAGE_PROTNONE
which was what I reacted to.
Linus
| |