lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Route keyboard LEDs through the generic LEDs layer.
Dmitry Torokhov, le Sun 06 Apr 2014 19:10:15 -0700, a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 02:23:23PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > This permits to reassign keyboard LEDs to something else than keyboard "leds"
> > state, by adding keyboard led and modifier triggers connected to a series
> > of VT input LEDs, themselves connected to VT input triggers, which
> > per-input device LEDs use by default. Userland can thus easily change the LED
> > behavior of (a priori) all input devices, or of particular input devices.
> >
>
> I still have the same concern that I believe I already mentioned a while
> ago: how do we reconcile the LED control via triggers with LED control
> done through event devices?

I don't remember that raised during the discussion.

> Currently, as far as I can see, they will be
> clashing with each other. I.e. if I remap my capslock led to be the new
> shiftlock and then userspace writes EV_LED/LED_CAPSL it would light up
> my new "shift lock", right?

Well, yes, sure, if you shoot in your foot it will hurt :) (although
here the damage is really small, it is just LED lighting or not).

I don't see why people would both tinker with such triggers and run
userland programs writing to evdev. Of course it typically happens with
X, but that's not a problem in the usual case: kbd triggers are not
doing anything while on X, so X can play with evdev with no problem.
If the user puts e.g. a heartbeat on some LED and then runs X, the X
events will mix with the heartbeat. The solution is for the user to
just disable the corresponding LED in the X keyboard configuration.
Do we really want to impose some overriding between VT-generated and
other application-generated events? AIUI, we don't do this between
applications which would open the same evdev, so I don't see why we
should care more about the VT.

> Also I wonder if we really need to have the multiplexing (VT-level) leds
> in addition to per-device ones.

We do: we want to be able to easily remap all (current and future)
keyboards' LEDs easily.

My goal, at the beginning, was to be able to fix the console-setup
bug. That was that console-setup wants to use, for the capslock key,
something else than the capslock mechanism hard-wired in the kernel,
so as to get way more fine-grain control over how caps is handled.
But then the capslock LED would not lit any more. By remapping the
VT-level capslock led to the foo-lock used by console-setup, one gets
back capslock LEDs of all keyboards working back as expected by the
user. I also use it for getting a group LED, just like I have on X,
to know which keyboard layout group I am in. People using non-latin
layouts really need that.

Samuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-07 10:41    [W:0.163 / U:2.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site