lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH] mtd: ubi: Free peb's synchronously for fastmap
On 4/7/2014 4:02 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
>> there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such scenario, fm_pool (which is
>> the pool from which user required PEBs are allocated) will be empty.
>> Try fixing the above described situation by synchronously performing
>> pending erase work, thus produce another free PEB.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tatyana Brokhman <tlinder@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
>> index 457ead3..9a36f78 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
>> @@ -595,10 +595,29 @@ static void refill_wl_pool(struct ubi_device *ubi)
>> static void refill_wl_user_pool(struct ubi_device *ubi)
>> {
>> struct ubi_fm_pool *pool = &ubi->fm_pool;
>> + int err;
>>
>> return_unused_pool_pebs(ubi, pool);
>>
>> for (pool->size = 0; pool->size < pool->max_size; pool->size++) {
>> +retry:
>> + if (!ubi->free.rb_node ||
>> + (ubi->free_count - ubi->beb_rsvd_pebs < 1)) {
>> + /*
>> + * There are no available PEBs. Try to free
>> + * PEB by means of synchronous execution of
>> + * pending works.
>> + */
>> + if (ubi->works_count == 0)
>> + break;
>> + spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);
>> + err = do_work(ubi);
>> + spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock);
>
> This is basically what produce_free_peb() does.

Right. I didn't use t just because of the termination condition.
produce_free_peb stops if there is 1 free peb. I need more then 1

>
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + break;
>> + goto retry;
>> + }
>> +
>> pool->pebs[pool->size] = __wl_get_peb(ubi);
>
> __wl_get_peb() already calls produce_free_peb() when we run out of free PEBs.
>
> Does your patch really fix a problem you encounter or did you find the
> issue by reviewing
> the code?
>

Yes. We encountered this issue, as described in the commit message. This
is the fix. Verified and working for us.

--
QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-07 18:41    [W:0.063 / U:2.684 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site