Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:38:54 +0200 | From | Jiri Olsa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] perf record: Propagate exit status of a command line workload |
| |
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:33:04PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:19:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:56:54PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > > perf_counter tools: Propagate signals properly > > > commit f7b7c26e01e51fe46097e11f179dc71ce7950084 > > > Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> > > > Date: Wed Jun 10 15:55:59 2009 +0200 > > > > > > but I dont think we need to do that > > > > But but but, then you're re-introducing that fail again? That no good. > > The thing is, just the return value is not sufficient to determine if > the child was interrupted. > > See WAIT(2), things like WIFSIGNALED() will not work when you just > propagate the return value, you need to terminate the task with a > signal to propagate this. >
cool, I just asked this in another email ;-) thanks
jirka
| |