lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] sched: idle: Add sched balance option
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:09:20PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> I agree a numerical value is not flexible. But it sounds weird to put a
> scheduler option in the sysfs and maybe more options will follow.
>
> I am wondering if we shouldn't create a new cgroup for 'energy' and put
> everything in there. So we will have more flexibility for extension and we
> will be able to create a group of tasks for performance and a group of tasks
> for energy saving.
>
> Does it make sense ?

The old knobs used to live here:

-What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_mc_power_savings
- /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_smt_power_savings

Not entirely sure that's a fine place, but it has precedent.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-28 20:41    [W:1.197 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site