Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:28:19 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: idle: Add sched balance option |
| |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:09:20PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > I agree a numerical value is not flexible. But it sounds weird to put a > scheduler option in the sysfs and maybe more options will follow. > > I am wondering if we shouldn't create a new cgroup for 'energy' and put > everything in there. So we will have more flexibility for extension and we > will be able to create a group of tasks for performance and a group of tasks > for energy saving. > > Does it make sense ?
The old knobs used to live here:
-What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_mc_power_savings - /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_smt_power_savings
Not entirely sure that's a fine place, but it has precedent.
| |