2014-04-26 7:33 GMT+09:00, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 12:03:41PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>>
>> The bp_proc_create() can be called if BP_PROC_SUPPORT is defined.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c |    5 +++++
>>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c
>> b/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c
>> index 6b9365b..5a3d758 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c
>> @@ -119,7 +119,10 @@ static void if_scan_init(void);
>>
>>  static int bypass_proc_create_dev_sd(struct bpctl_dev
>> *pbp_device_block);
>>  static int bypass_proc_remove_dev_sd(struct bpctl_dev
>> *pbp_device_block);
>> +
>> +#ifdef BP_PROC_SUPPORT
>>  static int bp_proc_create(void);
>> +#endif
>
> No, this code should just be removed, right?
Yes, someone sent a patch for this.

Regards,
Daeseok Youn
>
>