Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:29:07 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] pinctrl: add Intel BayTrail GPIO/pinctrl support | From | Linus Walleij <> |
| |
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Westerberg, Mika <mika.westerberg@intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 06:18:38AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> I'm wondering why a pinctrl driver for an >> ACPI platform should be defining pinmux function groups. I haven't >> gotten a straight answer to that question. > > Are you asking why pinctrl-baytrail.c uses pinctrl_gpio_ranges even if it > is a pretty much standard GPIO driver? Mathias probably can answer that > question better than me.
That was done on my request since any other approach obviously would lead to code duplication of exactly what GPIO ranges does.
Yours, Linus Walleij
| |