Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:04:09 +0100 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mfd: max14577: Add support for MAX77836 |
| |
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On śro, 2014-04-16 at 13:18 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > This is first part of fifth version of patchset adding support for > > > > > > > MAX77836 device to the max14577 driver. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I decided to split the patchset into smaller parts. I hope this would > > > > > > > help in getting necessary review/acks from maintainers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first part introduces changes in max14577 driver and adds support > > > > > > > for MAX77836 in MFD, extcon and regulator drivers. Most of these > > > > > > > patches already have required acks from maintainers. > > > > > > > Full v4 patchset can be found here: > > > > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1654267 > > > > > > > > > > > > So what's the plan for this driver now? What's missing? Do you have > > > > > > all the Acks you need? If so, I'm happy to apply this patch-set and > > > > > > supply a pull-request to the other maintainers. > > > > > > > > > > Next patches (part 2): > > > > > 1. charger: max14577: Add support for MAX77836 charger > > > > > 2. power: max17040: Add ID for MAX77836 Fuel Gauge block > > > > > 3. regulator/mfd: max14577: Export symbols for calculating charger > > > > > current > > > > > 4. charger: max14577: Configure battery-dependent settings from DTS > > > > > 5. Documentation: mfd: max14577: Add device tree bindings document > > > > > 6. regulator: max14577: Implement SUSPEND mode for MAX77836 LDO-s > > > > > > > > > > They are quite independent from each other so I think it would be the > > > > > best if you could prepare an immutable branch with first part of > > > > > patches. > > > > > > > > I'm only concerned with the patches in this set at the moment. > > > > > > > > Do all of the patches in _this_ set have all of the required Acks, or > > > > are you still waiting on some maintainers? > > > > > > I have all necessary Acks for this patchset. > > > One exception: patch 9/9 (regulator) was only reviewed by Mark Brown, > > > not acked: > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/28/252 > > > > That's okay. Still counts. :) > > If there are no more issues can you apply this patchset and prepare an > immutable branch with them?
Yep, it's on my TODO list for today.
-- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |