lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] ACPICA: Add <acpi/platform/aclinuxxf.h> to remove mis-ordered inclusion of <acpi/actypes.h> from <acpi/platform/aclinux.h>.
Date
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 02:01:57 AM Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi,
>
> <skip>
>
> > > +#define ACPI_NATIVE_INTERFACE_HEADER <acpi/platform/aclinuxxf.h>
> >
> > This is not good.
> >
> > We don't do things like this in the kernel, because they are confusing and hard
> > to debug if necessary, so please find a different way to make this work.
>
> I use this extra header file to collect:

I was not talking about the new header, which is basically OK, but about the
#define above, which is just too confusing to live.

Please use header file paths directly with #include.

> 1. static inline OSL functions
> 2. divergences of prototypes that haven't been back ported to ACPICA.
> This file is useful for ACPICA release automation.
>
> There are the following concerns that lead to the use of this solution:
> 1. for this extra header file itself
> A. The new header file is OSPM specific, thus it needn't be upstreamed to ACPICA;
> B. Since it needn't be upstreamed to ACPICA, ACPICA needn't determine the name of this extra header;
> C. It has to be the last file included by <acpi/acpi.h>.
> 2. for the file that includes this extra header file
> A. Currently there is no OSPM specific code in <acpi/acpi.h>.
> Thus I use a macro so that there is still no OSPM specific code in <acpi/acpi.h> and the name of the extra header can be determined by OSPM.
>
> If you want another solution, is the following acceptable?
> 1. In <acpi/platform/aclinux.h>
> #define ACPI_INCLUDE_EXTRA_NATIVE_HEADER 1
> 2. In <acpi/acpi.h> <- this is an ACPICA header file,
> #ifdef ACPI_INCLUDE_EXTRA_NATIVE_HEADER
> #include <acpi/platform/acextra.h>
> #endif
> Note that in this solution, the name of the extra header file will be determined by ACPICA.

I think I see what you're trying to do now. And I see that this ACPI_NATIVE_INTERFACE_HEADER
thing is already there in the Linus' tree which is not good at all.

I probably would create an extra ACPICA header, something like <acpios_opt.h>,
that would be empty for all hosts except for Linux and that would contain the
stuff you want to put into acextra.h in Linux.

That would be clean enough I suppose?

Rafael



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-22 13:41    [W:0.074 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site