lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V4 1/5] phy: Add new Exynos5 USB 3.0 PHY driver
Date
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 11:49 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> wrote:
> > On 15.04.2014 08:09, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 09.04.2014 13:49, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So, USB30_SCLK_100M is the SCLK that we are talking in the driver. I
> >>> don't see any reference to XXTI in the USB 3.0 DRD controller chapter
> >>> (in both Exynos5250 and 5420)
> >>> In addition to this there's one more point to be noticed here.
> >>> On Exynos5420 system, the sclk_usbphy300 (which is the sclk_usbphy30
> >>> for USB DRD channel 0), is also the PICO phy clock, i.e. USB 2.0 phy
> >>> clock.
> >>> So we should add a similar clk_get() for this clock in the
> >>> phy-exynos5250-usb2 driver too, to support Exynos5420.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is something clear from the above block diagram ? (although the
> >> diagram looks weird - space and tabs problem :-( )
> >> Basically there's the clock USB30_SCLK_100M which is going into the
> >> USB 3.0 DRD PHY controller.
> >> And this is the only sclk mentioned in the block diagram for USB 3.0
> >> DRD controller in Exynos5420.
> >> Same is not there in the block diagram in Exynos5250 UM.
> >
> >
> > From what I can see in the documentation, there are 4 USB 3.0 related clocks
> > generated in CMU:
> >
> > - sclk_usbphy300,
> > - sclk_usbphy301,
> > - sclk_usbdrd300,
> > - sclk_usbdrd301,
> >
> > They are all rated to max. 24 MHz and the recommended operating frequency is
> > 24 MHz, so it looks exactly like USB PHY reference, which is usually a 24
> > MHz clock.
> >
> > To me, this looks like on Exynos5420 a separate special clock path is used
> > instead of xusbxti as reference of USB 3.0 PHY and so the sclk should be
> > simply passed as the "ref" clock.
>
> Ok, i will clear on this with the hardware engineer also once.
> May be Jingoo can help me with this.
>
> Jingoo,
> Can you please enquire about the clock path of usbphy30 reference
> clocks on Exynos5420.
> As mentioned by Tomasz above, we have sclk_usbphy300 and
> sclk_usbphy301 as the reference clocks for USB3.0 DRD phy. *Also*
> sclk_usbphy300 is used for Pico phy (which is the USb 2.0 phy used by
> ehci/ohci controller on Exynos5420).
> It will be of great help.

Hi Vevek, Tomasz

Long time no see.

I asked USB S/W engineer and USB H/W engineer.

There are two USB3.0 on Exynos5420; thus there are two sclks
such as 'sclk_usbphy300 and sclk_usbphy301'.

As Tomasz mentioned, 'sclk_usbphy300 and sclk_usbphy301' can
be used instead of 'xusbxti' as reference of USB 3.0 PHY.

However, on Exynos5420, "ONLY" 'sclk_usbphy300' can be used
for USB2.0 pico phy. (so, '301' CANNOT support USB2.0 pico phy.)

Best regards,
Jingoo Han



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-22 04:41    [W:0.109 / U:35.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site