lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 05/19] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS
On 04/17/2014 11:50 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:03:57AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> +#if !defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)&& !defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
>> +#error "Missing either LITTLE_ENDIAN or BIG_ENDIAN definition."
>> +#endif
> This seems entirely superfluous, I don't think a kernel build will go
> anywhere if either is missing.

Yes, I am on the conservative side when I add that. I can certainly take
it out if you think that is not needed.

-Longman


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-18 00:01    [W:0.248 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site