[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] net: Implement SO_PASSCGROUP to enable passing cgroup path
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 12:21 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:13:57PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > The only one that *may* be reasonable is the "secret" cgroup name one,
> > however nobody seem to come up with a reason why it is legitimate to
> > allow to keep cgroup names secret.
> Ugh, please don't play security games with cgroup names. It is one of
> the identifying properties of a task, like a pid, and will be used in
> other parts of the kernel to match groups of tasks. If we play
> security peekaboo with cgroup names, it has to be transitive and puts
> burdens on all its future uses. Unless there are *REALLY* strong
> rationales, which can also justify hiding pids, this isn't happening.

FWIW, I totally agree with you, it's Andy Lutomirski that is coming up
with this "secret" cgropus name idea, nobody else (so far) seem to agree
it makes sense.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-17 21:01    [W:0.130 / U:1.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site