[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Mark Brown <> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:34:47PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mark Brown <> wrote:
>> > Please don't send new patches as replies in the middle of threads, it
>> > makes it confusing trying to work out which versions of things should be
>> > applied.
>> I'm a little confused about what I did wrong. Can you give more details?
> I'm seeing a reply which looks like it was sent as a followup to Randy's
> comment, although now I look at everything together I think that's due
> to you sending your new thread in reply to the old thread (that can also
> be a problem due to threading either burying the new mail or putting
> things in odd places) and my mailer trying to tie the one mail from your
> first series that I'd not deleted into the thread.

OK, I'm about to send my v3 of the thread taking Randy's comments
about kernel-doc into account. I'll explicitly not mark it as
"in-reply-to" the previous thread and hope that solves the problems
you were seeing.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-17 02:21    [W:0.115 / U:2.628 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site