Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:28:28 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] PM / Hibernate: no kernel_power_off when pm_power_off NULL | From | Sebastian Capella <> |
| |
On 15 April 2014 14:18, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: > On Tue 2014-04-15 21:54:53, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> What I'm basically saying is that I see no reason for ARM to do something >> different to what x86 does. >> >> What is pretty clear to me is that ARM is compatible with x86, which is >> compatible with kernel/reboot.c, and it's the hibernate code which is >> the odd one out. > > I'm pretty sure the original code did not return. Anyway, the best > solution, given how many platforms are out there, would be to > > a) document that it should not return > > b) fix hibernation to handle the returning case, anyway.
Thanks Russell and Pavel!
This sounds fine to me. Any objections?
Thanks!
Sebastian
| |