[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: How do I increment a per-CPU variable without warning?
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:08:03AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello, Christoph,
> >
> > I have a patch that currently uses __this_cpu_inc_return() to increment a
> > per-CPU variable, but without preemption disabled. Of course, given that
> > preemption is enabled, it might well end up picking up one CPU's counter,
> > adding one to it, then storing the result into some other CPU's counter.
> > But this is OK, the test can be probabilistic. And when I run this
> > against v3.14 and earlier, it works fine.
> We introduced raw_cpu_inc_return to squish these warnings.

Cool, this is a good short-term fix.

> > This is arguably better than the original __this_cpu_read() because it
> > avoids overflow, but I thought I should check to see if there was some
> > better way to do this.
> If this is supposed to be totally race safe then you must disable
> preemption.


Thanx, Paul

 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-16 18:21    [W:2.992 / U:35.584 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site