lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: oops in slab/leaks_show
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:36:27AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 03/11/2014 10:30 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >---------8<---------------------
> > From ff6fe77fb764ca5bf8705bf53d07d38e4111e84c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:14:25 +0900
> >Subject: [PATCH] slab: remove kernel_map_pages() optimization in slab
> > poisoning
> >
> >If CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC enables, slab poisoning functionality uses
> >kernel_map_pages(), instead of real poisoning, to detect memory corruption
> >with low overhead. But, in that case, slab leak detector trigger oops.
> >Reason is that slab leak detector accesses all active objects, especially
> >including objects in cpu slab caches to get the caller information.
> >These objects are already unmapped via kernel_map_pages() to detect memory
> >corruption, so oops could be triggered.
> >
> >Following is oops message reported from Dave.
> >
> >It blew up when something tried to read /proc/slab_allocators
> >(Just cat it, and you should see the oops below)
> >
> > Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> > Modules linked in: fuse hidp snd_seq_dummy tun rfcomm bnep llc2 af_key can_raw ipt_ULOG can_bcm nfnetlink scsi_transport_iscsi nfc caif_socket caif af_802154 phonet af_rxrpc can pppoe pppox ppp_generic
> > +slhc irda crc_ccitt rds rose x25 atm netrom appletalk ipx p8023 psnap p8022 llc ax25 cfg80211 xfs coretemp hwmon x86_pkg_temp_thermal kvm_intel kvm crct10dif_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel
> > +libcrc32c usb_debug microcode snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic pcspkr btusb bluetooth 6lowpan_iphc rfkill snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm
> > +snd_timer e1000e snd ptp shpchp soundcore pps_core serio_raw
> > CPU: 1 PID: 9386 Comm: trinity-c33 Not tainted 3.14.0-rc5+ #131
> > task: ffff8801aa46e890 ti: ffff880076924000 task.ti: ffff880076924000
> > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffaa1a8f4a>] [<ffffffffaa1a8f4a>] handle_slab+0x8a/0x180
> > RSP: 0018:ffff880076925de0 EFLAGS: 00010002
> > RAX: 0000000000001000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000005ce85ce7
> > RDX: ffffea00079be100 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: ffff880107458000
> > RBP: ffff880076925e18 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
> > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000000000000000f R12: ffff8801e6f84000
> > R13: ffffea00079be100 R14: ffff880107458000 R15: ffff88022bb8d2c0
> > FS: 00007fb769e45740(0000) GS:ffff88024d040000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > CR2: ffff8801e6f84ff8 CR3: 00000000a22db000 CR4: 00000000001407e0
> > DR0: 0000000002695000 DR1: 0000000002695000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000070602
> > Stack:
> > ffff8802339dcfc0 ffff88022bb8d2c0 ffff880107458000 ffff88022bb8d2c0
> > ffff8802339dd008 ffff8802339dcfc0 ffffea00079be100 ffff880076925e68
> > ffffffffaa1ad9be ffff880203fe4f00 ffff88022bb8d318 0000000076925e98
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffffaa1ad9be>] leaks_show+0xce/0x240
> > [<ffffffffaa1e6c0e>] seq_read+0x28e/0x490
> > [<ffffffffaa23008d>] proc_reg_read+0x3d/0x80
> > [<ffffffffaa1c026b>] vfs_read+0x9b/0x160
> > [<ffffffffaa1c0d88>] SyS_read+0x58/0xb0
> > [<ffffffffaa7420aa>] tracesys+0xd4/0xd9
> > Code: f5 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 63 c8 44 3b 0c 8a 0f 84 e3 00 00 00 83 c0 01 44 39 c0 72 eb 41 f6 47 1a 01 0f 84 e9 00 00 00 89 f0 <4d> 8b 4c 04 f8 4d 85 c9 0f 84 88 00 00 00 49 8b 7e 08 4d 8d 46
> > RIP [<ffffffffaa1a8f4a>] handle_slab+0x8a/0x180
> > RSP <ffff880076925de0>
> > CR2: ffff8801e6f84ff8
> >
> >There are two solutions to fix the problem. One is to disable
> >CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK if CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y. The other is to remove
> >kernel_map_pages() optimization in slab poisoning. I think that
> >second one is better, since we can use all functionality with some more
> >overhead. slab poisoning is already heavy operation, so adding more
> >overhead doesn't weaken their value.
> >
> >Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Joonsoo, can you please resend against slab/next? I'm seeing some
> rejects here.
>

Hello Pekka.

I send different patch to fix this bug.
You can see it on following link.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/15/727

With some more study, I found that using DEBUG_PAGEALLOC on SLAB is
for not only optimization but also easily detection who corrupt memory.
So, I change the solution to fix this bug. Please refer it.

Thanks.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-16 02:21    [W:0.067 / U:2.688 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site