lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] PM / Hibernate: no kernel_power_off when pm_power_off NULL
From
Ping..

There appears to be disagreement on the correct path to take on this.

Pavel and Alan recommend that arm's machine_power_off shall never return

Russell suggests hibernation be modified to handle machine_power_off
returning; that x86 architecture (and others as well) can have
machine_power_off returning.

Discussions available at the links below:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/554 -- linux-arm discussion
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/20/649 -- linux-pm discussion

Should I continue with the original hibernation patch from the
linux-pm discussion?

Does anyone have any response to Russel's commentsl?

Thanks!

Sebastian


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-15 23:41    [W:0.078 / U:70.456 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site