Messages in this thread | | | From | Neil Zhang <> | Date | Tue, 15 Apr 2014 05:37:17 -0700 | Subject | RE: [PATCH v2] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier |
| |
Will, Thanks for the comments!
> -----Original Message----- > From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.deacon@arm.com] > Sent: 2014年4月15日 16:48 > To: Neil Zhang > Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sudeep Holla > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier > > Hello, > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:42:22AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote: > > From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> > > > > This adds core support for saving and restoring CPU PMU registers for > > suspend/resume support i.e. deeper C-states in cpuidle terms. > > This patch adds support only to ARMv7 PMU registers save/restore. > > It needs to be extended to xscale and ARMv6 if needed. > > > > [Neil] We found that DS-5 not work on our CA7 based SoCs. > > After debuging, found PMU registers were lost because of core power down. > > Then i found Sudeep had a patch to fix it about two years ago but not > > in the mainline, just port it. > > What I don't like about this patch is that we're introducing significant > overhead for SoCs that don't require save/restore of the PMU state. I'd much > rather see core power down disabled whilst the PMU is in use but, if that's not > possible, then I think we need to: > > (1) Make this conditional for cores that really need it > > (2) Only save/restore if the PMU is in use (even better, just save/restore > the live registers, but that's probably not worth the effort > initially). >
The patch has check the ARMV7_PMNC_E bit when save / restore, so suppose only the core's that use PMU will do the save / restore work.
> (3) Ensure we ->reset the PMU before doing the restore
Ok, I can add it in the next version.
> > Will
Best Regards, Neil Zhang
| |