[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Query]: tick-sched: why don't we stop tick when we are running idle task?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:52:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:30:04AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > There is probably a few things that assume local calls but last time
> > I checked I had the impression that it was fairly possible to call sched_class::task_tick()
> > remotely. rq is locked, no reference to "current", use rq accessors...
> >
> > OTOH scheduler_tick() itself definetly requires local calls.
> possible isn't the problem, its completely insane to do that.

What's more, I'm still waiting to hear why we're wanting to do any of

 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-15 13:41    [W:0.087 / U:4.876 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site