Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:52:26 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [Query]: tick-sched: why don't we stop tick when we are running idle task? |
| |
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:30:04AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > There is probably a few things that assume local calls but last time > I checked I had the impression that it was fairly possible to call sched_class::task_tick() > remotely. rq is locked, no reference to "current", use rq accessors... > > OTOH scheduler_tick() itself definetly requires local calls.
possible isn't the problem, its completely insane to do that.
| |