[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/1] pinctrl: add Intel BayTrail GPIO/pinctrl support
On 04/14/2014 06:11 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 04/14/2014 02:52 AM, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>> This was the conclusion we reached after some discussion with Linus W.
>> Initially this was just a GPIO driver, but Linus correctly spotted that
>> Baytrail has many pinctrl-like features (like pin muxing, etc) that we
>> might need to address in the future.
>> threads where this was discussed:
> So this is the interesting part:
>> We expect BIOS to set all pin configurations correctly.
> This device will only be used on an ACPI system, right? And isn't ACPI
> supposed to hide all the pinctrl programming from the OS? I thought
> that was the whole point behind ACPI and the reason why ARM64 isn't
> going to use device trees.

This was my starting point as well, and the driver was initially
submitted as a GPIO driver. But Linus W. suggested pinctrl instead, and
as he's the maintainer of both those subsystem I trust his judgment.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-15 12:21    [W:0.099 / U:5.968 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site