lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 24/38] tick-sched: don't check tick_nohz_full_cpu() in __tick_nohz_task_switch()
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:53:46PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> __tick_nohz_task_switch() calls tick_nohz_full_kick(), which is already checking
> tick_nohz_full_cpu() and so we don't need to repeat the same check here.
>
> Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Ack.

> ---
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 256f4a3..5a99859 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -261,13 +261,9 @@ void __tick_nohz_task_switch(struct task_struct *tsk)
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
>
> - if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
> - goto out;
> -
> if (tick_nohz_tick_stopped() && !can_stop_full_tick())
> tick_nohz_full_kick();
>
> -out:
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-15 01:41    [W:0.142 / U:25.080 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site