From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:42:20 +0100

> On 12/04/14 21:51, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 11:55:40 +0200
>> 
>>> This patch fixes the initialization of an array used in the TX
>>> datapath that was mistakenly initialized together with the
>>> RX datapath arrays. An out of range array access could happen
>>> when RX and TX rings had different sizes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com>
>> 
>> Good catch, applied, thanks.
> 
> Thanks.  You can queue this for net-next since the Tx and Rx rings are
> the same constant size.

I was able to determine when I reviewed this patch that the size in bytes
of the rings are the same (PAGE_SIZE), but I couldn't ascertain whether
the individual ring entries in the TX ring and RX ring are the same size.

Are they?