Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 3.14 08/23] xen-netback: BUG_ON in xenvif_rx_action() not catching overflow | Date | Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:11:57 -0700 |
| |
3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
[ Upstream commit 1425c7a4e8d3d2eebf308bcbdc3fa3c1247686b4 ]
The BUG_ON to catch ring overflow in xenvif_rx_action() makes the assumption that meta_slots_used == ring slots used. This is not necessarily the case for GSO packets, because the non-prefix GSO protocol consumes one more ring slot than meta-slot for the 'extra_info'. This patch changes the test to actually check ring slots.
Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> --- drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c @@ -482,6 +482,8 @@ static void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenv while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&vif->rx_queue)) != NULL) { RING_IDX max_slots_needed; + RING_IDX old_req_cons; + RING_IDX ring_slots_used; int i; /* We need a cheap worse case estimate for the number of @@ -530,8 +532,12 @@ static void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenv vif->rx_last_skb_slots = 0; sco = (struct skb_cb_overlay *)skb->cb; + + old_req_cons = vif->rx.req_cons; sco->meta_slots_used = xenvif_gop_skb(skb, &npo); - BUG_ON(sco->meta_slots_used > max_slots_needed); + ring_slots_used = vif->rx.req_cons - old_req_cons; + + BUG_ON(ring_slots_used > max_slots_needed); __skb_queue_tail(&rxq, skb); }
| |