| Date | Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:24:12 +0200 | From | Martin Schwidefsky <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 11/15] s390: NR_syscalls fix |
| |
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:25:47 +0200 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> > > Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> > --- > arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h > index 5eb5c9ddb120..57194268fe63 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ > #define __NR_finit_module 344 > #define __NR_sched_setattr 345 > #define __NR_sched_getattr 346 > -#define NR_syscalls 345 > +#define NR_syscalls 347 > > /* > * There are some system calls that are not present on 64 bit, some
Is this patch part of a patch series that does upstream directly? I am asking because Heiko already created a patch for this and we have added it to the linux-s390:fixes branch for upstream integration.
-- blue skies, Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
|