lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 10/27] ARM: dts: exynos3250: Add new exynos3250.dtsi file
Hi,

On 04/11/2014 01:01 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> On 10 April 2014 15:36, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> wrote:
>> From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
>>
>> This patch add new exynos3250.dtsi to support Exynos3250 SoC and includes
>> chipid/sys_reg dt node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..3c8cee6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Samsung's Exynos3250 SoC device tree source
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>> + * http://www.samsung.com
>> + *
>> + * Samsung's Exynos3250 SoC device nodes are listed in this file. Exynos3250
>> + * based board files can include this file and provide values for board specfic
>> + * bindings.
>> + *
>> + * Note: This file does not include device nodes for all the controllers in
>> + * Exynos3250 SoC. As device tree coverage for Exynos3250 increases, additional
>> + * nodes can be added to this file.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "skeleton.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos3250";
>> +
>> + chipid@10000000 {
>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-chipid";
>> + reg = <0x10000000 0x100>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sys_reg: syscon@10010000 {
>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos3-sysreg", "syscon";
>> + reg = <0x10010000 0x400>;
>> + };
>> +};
>
> Shouldn't these be grouped under the soc node?

I don't understand accurate meaning.
Do you have to explain more detailed comment?

Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-11 07:21    [W:0.326 / U:3.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site