Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:19:32 +0100 | From | Maxime Ripard <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: Fix compilation breakage |
| |
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 04:08:36PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 03:59:30PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > @@ -900,7 +902,8 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pd) > > exit_free_irq: > > free_irq(drv_data->irq, drv_data); > > exit_reset: > > - if (pd->dev.of_node && !IS_ERR(drv_data->rstc)) > > + if (pd->dev.of_node && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER) && > > + !IS_ERR(drv_data->rstc)) > > reset_control_assert(drv_data->rstc); > > Another question is... why do we need to check pd->dev.of_node here? > If CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER is set, we always try to get the reset > controller node, so drv_data->rstc is either going to be a valid > pointer, or it's going to be an error pointer - neither > reset_control_get() nor devm_reset_control_get return NULL.
Hmmm, right. I'll fix this in a later version.
Wolfram, do you want me to respin the patch making use of reset_get_optional introduced by Philip in its other mail?
-- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |