lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Include the limit on the number of pfns we can handle
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 09:07:42AM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@oracle.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 7, 2014 1:46 PM
> > To: KY Srinivasan
> > Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > devel@linuxdriverproject.org; olaf@aepfle.de; apw@canonical.com;
> > jasowang@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Include the limit on the number
> > of pfns we can handle
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:15:08PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > > Increase the maximum number of pfns we can handle is a single vmbus
> > packet.
> > ^^ in
>
> Thanks Dan. I am traveling in India and it shows. I have already sent a corrected patch.
>

Yeah. I saw that. Thanks.

> > >
> >
> > What are the user visible effects of this patch?
> The current code will drop these packets that have more PFNs than the limit.
> Upping the limit will mitigate this problem.
>

Meanwhile, the revised patch says that it is not a bugfix. It sort of
sounds like upping the limit does improve performance for some people?

I am confused now.

regards,
dan carpenter



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-07 11:01    [W:0.179 / U:0.276 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site