Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:42:10 +0100 | From | Richard Cochran <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] timerfd: Add support for deferrable timers |
| |
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 11:11:21PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Once we agree on a solution to the Y2038 issue on 32bit with a unified > 32/64 bit syscall interface which simply gets rid of the timespec/val > nonsense and takes a simple u64 nsec value we can add the slack > property to that without any further inconvenience.
Can you expand on this tangent a bit?
Who needs to agree, and where is this being debated?
Thanks, Richard
| |