lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[tip:timers/urgent] time: Revert to calling clock_was_set_delayed () while in irq context
Commit-ID:  cab5e127eef040399902caa8e1510795583fa03a
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/cab5e127eef040399902caa8e1510795583fa03a
Author: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:30:49 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:07:07 +0100

time: Revert to calling clock_was_set_delayed() while in irq context

In commit 47a1b796306356f35 ("tick/timekeeping: Call
update_wall_time outside the jiffies lock"), we moved to calling
clock_was_set() due to the fact that we were no longer holding
the timekeeping or jiffies lock.

However, there is still the problem that clock_was_set()
triggers an IPI, which cannot be done from the timer's hard irq
context, and will generate WARN_ON warnings.

Apparently in my earlier testing, I'm guessing I didn't bump the
dmesg log level, so I somehow missed the WARN_ONs.

Thus we need to revert back to calling clock_was_set_delayed().

Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1395963049-11923-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 0aa4ce8..5b40279 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1435,7 +1435,8 @@ void update_wall_time(void)
out:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
if (clock_set)
- clock_was_set();
+ /* Have to call _delayed version, since in irq context*/
+ clock_was_set_delayed();
}

/**

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-28 10:01    [W:0.073 / U:4.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site