Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:51:15 +0000 | From | Russell King - ARM Linux <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: machine_power_off should not return |
| |
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:45:55PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Let's Cc: LAKML, and To: Russell. > > Russell, any comments on this? > > Without this patch we got the heartbeat's reboot_notifier called twice while > testing the recent hibernation patches, which was unexpected and produced a > kernel panic: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/19/363
I don't see why we should make this change. kernel/reboot.c handles this function returning, so other places should do too.
Even on x86, this function can return:
void machine_power_off(void) { machine_ops.power_off(); }
.power_off = native_machine_power_off,
static void native_machine_power_off(void) { if (pm_power_off) { if (!reboot_force) machine_shutdown(); pm_power_off(); } /* A fallback in case there is no PM info available */ tboot_shutdown(TB_SHUTDOWN_HALT); }
void tboot_shutdown(u32 shutdown_type) { void (*shutdown)(void);
if (!tboot_enabled()) return;
Therefore, I'd say... it's a bug in the hibernation code - or we probably have many buggy architectures. I'd suggest fixing the hibernation code rather than stuffing some workaround like an endless loop into every architecture.
-- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
| |