Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:35:55 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] tick: fix spelling mistake in tick_handle_periodic() | From | Stratos Karafotis <> |
| |
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > One of the comments in tick_handle_periodic() had 'when' instead of 'which' (My > guess :)). Fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > --- > kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c > index 20b2fe3..791a3a2 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev) > * to be sure we're using a real hardware clocksource. > * Otherwise we could get trapped in an infinite > * loop, as the tick_periodic() increments jiffies, > - * when then will increment time, posibly causing > + * which then will increment time, posibly causing
Also, on the same line s/posibly/possibly
Stratos
| |