| Date | Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:02:59 -0400 | From | Phillip Susi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/33] [RFC] Non disruptive application core dump infrastructure |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 3/21/2014 4:17 AM, Karel Zak wrote: > The gencore command looks like a good idea, but why we need the > client-server infrastructure? At least at first glance it seems > like overkill.
Yes, the server seems pointless.
>> We would like to push this to one of the following packages: a) >> util-linux b) coreutils c) procps-ng > > d) somewhere near to gdb :-)
gdb already has such a thing; it's called gcore. Kind of makes this work seem redundant?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTLFSjAAoJEI5FoCIzSKrwuTIH/jGtc3dB1WKgtDSE2wtXXHO0 0WxhWDbVkpJ0Q+tkG/tjw4wudYtEJ+XAHsCIK3vH7OMX7i4PMOLDgjT/FyxTPrWl W+eUCazi4vRPNGscii5mRFlsthgEd2pofotlx5UB7Br9D05/QZqErtEMJMqD935V 94wlvJSvJI0n3hfAUgcM8apxTgxYr/TIPEQPfqLem3xTZIw3lTRic613Qji2Kwif l+kqs0WLy/AHEwBLRrXDQahnv5n2IhOVUn3KDwm9Su56rbrmAF7LAvK0+uxRyoQk IVC5h8BdBQ4QMYl7KYYEPy+n+0Qbe1EQ4tLmYvaEBwXP5c0QDGX0M5VUkko+eGI= =zFoW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|