[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/6] shm: add memfd_create() syscall
On 03/20/2014 03:29 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Pavel Emelyanov <> wrote:
>> On 03/20/2014 12:47 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>>> If I'm not mistaken in something obvious, this looks similar to /proc/pid/map_files
>>> feature, Pavel?
>> It is, but the map_files will work "in the opposite direction" :) In the memfd
>> case one first gets an FD, then mmap()s it; in the /proc/pis/map_files case one
>> should first mmap() a region, then open it via /proc/self/map_files.
>> But I don't know whether this matters.
> Yes, you can replace memfd_create() so far with:
> p = mmap(NULL, size, ..., MAP_ANON | MAP_SHARED, -1, 0);
> sprintf(path, "/proc/self/map_files/%lx-%lx", p, p + size);
> fd = open(path, O_RDWR);
> However, map_files is only enabled with CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE, the
> /proc/pid/map_files/ directory is root-only (at least I get EPERM if
> non-root),

Yes. But this is something we'd also like to have fixed :) Having two
parties willing the same makes it easier for the patch to get accepted.

> it doesn't provide the "name" argument which is very handy
> for debugging,

What if we make mmap's shmem_zero_setup() generate a meaningful name,
would it solve the debugging issue?

> it doesn't explicitly support sealing (it requires MAP_ANON to be backed
> by shmem)

Can you elaborate on this? The fd generated by sys_memfd() will be
shmem-backed, so will be the file opened via map_files link for the
MAP_ANON | MAP_SHARED mapping. So what are the problems to make it
support sealing?

> and it's a very weird API for something this simple.



 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-20 13:21    [W:0.050 / U:10.852 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site