lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/2] kallsyms: handle special absolute symbols
Date
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
>>> Why not just do this with 0-base-address detection like my v2? That
>>> would mean we don't need to remember to add this flag in the future to
>>> imagined new architectures that might want this 0-based per_cpu
>>> feature.
>>
>> Because future architectures will get this right and emit absolute
>> symbols. I hope!
>>
>> I'm swamped at the moment, but am hoping to investigate that for
>> x86-64. This is a stop-gap.
>
> Okay, I'm convinced. :)
>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>
> Thanks!

Applied, thanks.

Cheers,
Rusty.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-17 06:21    [W:0.115 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site