Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kallsyms: handle special absolute symbols | Date | Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:06:48 +1030 |
| |
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: >> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes: >>> Why not just do this with 0-base-address detection like my v2? That >>> would mean we don't need to remember to add this flag in the future to >>> imagined new architectures that might want this 0-based per_cpu >>> feature. >> >> Because future architectures will get this right and emit absolute >> symbols. I hope! >> >> I'm swamped at the moment, but am hoping to investigate that for >> x86-64. This is a stop-gap. > > Okay, I'm convinced. :) > > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> > > Thanks!
Applied, thanks.
Cheers, Rusty.
| |