lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 04/16] perf mem: Clarify load-latency in documentation
Date
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Clarify in the documentation that 'perf mem report' reports use-latency,
not load/store-latency on Intel systems.

This often causes confusion with users.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393596135-4227-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt
index 888d51137fbe..1d78a4064da4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt
+++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt
@@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ from it, into perf.data. Perf record options are accepted and are passed through
"perf mem -t <TYPE> report" displays the result. It invokes perf report with the
right set of options to display a memory access profile.

+Note that on Intel systems the memory latency reported is the use-latency,
+not the pure load (or store latency). Use latency includes any pipeline
+queueing delays in addition to the memory subsystem latency.
+
OPTIONS
-------
<command>...::
--
1.8.1.4


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-14 23:41    [W:0.088 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site