Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:00:11 +0800 | From | Alex Shi <> | Subject | Re: [sched/balance] INFO: possible recursive locking detected |
| |
On 03/13/2014 04:53 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 03:43:11PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: >> On 03/03/2014 10:25 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is >>> >>> https://github.com/alexshi/power-scheduling.git single-balance.bak >>> commit 2adc591a5cb6768ad11e63be9011906aa171148d >>> Author: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> >>> AuthorDate: Fri Feb 28 15:25:09 2014 +0800 >>> Commit: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> >>> CommitDate: Sun Mar 2 09:16:38 2014 +0800 >>> >>> sched/balance: replace new_idle_balance >>> >>> Curren idle_balance will pull task on half of this group. That is >>> not needed in central balance. >> >> >> Thanks for your testing, Fengguang! >> >> I fixed this issue and updated to the git tree. Is the single-balance >> branch still in your performance radar? :) > > Sure, however you know it's costly to queue tests for one single tree. > If your trees are directly based on -rcX kernels, that would cut the > tests required for comparison by half.
Thanks a lot! I will keep in mind for this point. rebased on rc6 kernel for that branch. :)
Thanks again for generous help!
-- Thanks Alex
| |