lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
> "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 9:14:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:52:33 +0000 (UTC)
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
> > > "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
> > > "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 7:34:50 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument
> > >
> > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:04:57 -0400
> > > Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Describe the @data argument (probe private data).
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 38516ab59fbc "tracing: Let tracepoints have data passed to
> > > > tracepoint callbacks"
> > > > CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > > > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > > > CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> > > > CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > >
> > > No signed-off-by.
> >
> > Hi Steven,
> >
> > I'm curious to understand the reason of this "no signed-off-by" on a
> > trivial
> > patch that fixes the missing DocBook comments for one of your previous
> > commits that has been upstream for a few years. What am I missing ?
> > Perhaps you meant this reply for my other documentation update patch (2/2)
> > ?
> >
>
> I mean, my scripts wont accept a patch that the author never added
> their signed-off-by to.
>
> In other words, resubmit, and add your own signed-off-by that happens to
> be missing from this patch.

Oh, sorry, I missed that. Will do.

Thanks,

Mathieu

>
> -- Steve
>

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-12 17:01    [W:0.040 / U:0.852 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site