Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Mar 2014 21:14:02 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument |
| |
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>, > > "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 7:34:50 PM > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument > > > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:04:57 -0400 > > Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote: > > > > > Describe the @data argument (probe private data). > > > > > > Fixes: 38516ab59fbc "tracing: Let tracepoints have data passed to > > > tracepoint callbacks" > > > CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> > > > CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> > > > CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > > No signed-off-by. > > Hi Steven, > > I'm curious to understand the reason of this "no signed-off-by" on a trivial > patch that fixes the missing DocBook comments for one of your previous > commits that has been upstream for a few years. What am I missing ? > Perhaps you meant this reply for my other documentation update patch (2/2) ? >
I mean, my scripts wont accept a patch that the author never added their signed-off-by to.
In other words, resubmit, and add your own signed-off-by that happens to be missing from this patch.
-- Steve
| |