lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:52:33 +0000 (UTC)
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
> > "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 7:34:50 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:04:57 -0400
> > Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Describe the @data argument (probe private data).
> > >
> > > Fixes: 38516ab59fbc "tracing: Let tracepoints have data passed to
> > > tracepoint callbacks"
> > > CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > > CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> > > CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >
> > No signed-off-by.
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> I'm curious to understand the reason of this "no signed-off-by" on a trivial
> patch that fixes the missing DocBook comments for one of your previous
> commits that has been upstream for a few years. What am I missing ?
> Perhaps you meant this reply for my other documentation update patch (2/2) ?
>

I mean, my scripts wont accept a patch that the author never added
their signed-off-by to.

In other words, resubmit, and add your own signed-off-by that happens to
be missing from this patch.

-- Steve


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-12 02:41    [W:0.108 / U:0.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site