lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:52:42 +0000
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:

> On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:27:21 +0000
> > Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > Here's the new patch:
> > >
> > > Doesn't add #includes and doesn't change any types, so of course it
> > > doesn't compile. WTF?
> > >
> >
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > This is an old thread. Which kernel did you apply it to. Before I send
> > any patch set out, I run a small test (heavy stress test, and also
> > compile several different configs). This patch was against 3.10-rt, and
> > may have already had the includes needed. I know the original patch
> > compiled, but I may not have tested the second patch.
> >
> > Do you need this patch? Or did I miss something for 3.2-rt?
>
> You applied it to 3.2-rt:
>
> commit 916c8d2de3c4759f57426fa3cfee63b491e88939
> Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Date: Mon Oct 28 11:50:06 2013 +0100
>
> swait: Add a few more users
>
> and 3.4-rt, 3.8-rt, 3.10-rt. So far as I can see, it is broken on all
> of those branches, though I only actually tried building 3.2-rt.
>

Can you send me your config. I may just not be hitting it. I've booted
and ran all these kernels I've posted.

I don't run a make allmodconfig as I do on my upstream work. Maybe I'll
have to add that to the mix.

-- Steve


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-10 20:01    [W:0.101 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site