Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:59:43 +0900 | From | AKASHI Takahiro <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] audit: Enable arm64 support |
| |
Richard,
On 01/30/2014 07:36 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 14/01/29, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: >> On 14/01/27, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: >>> [To audit maintainers] >>> >>> On 01/23/2014 11:18 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:13:14AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: >>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h >>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h >>>>> @@ -327,6 +327,8 @@ enum { >>>>> /* distinguish syscall tables */ >>>>> #define __AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT 0x80000000 >>>>> #define __AUDIT_ARCH_LE 0x40000000 >>>>> +#define AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64 (EM_AARCH64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) >>>>> +#define AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64EB (EM_AARCH64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT) >>>>> #define AUDIT_ARCH_ALPHA (EM_ALPHA|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) >>>>> #define AUDIT_ARCH_ARM (EM_ARM|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) >>>>> #define AUDIT_ARCH_ARMEB (EM_ARM) >>>>> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig >>>>> index 79383d3..3aae602 100644 >>>>> --- a/init/Kconfig >>>>> +++ b/init/Kconfig >>>>> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ config AUDIT >>>>> >>>>> config AUDITSYSCALL >>>>> bool "Enable system-call auditing support" >>>>> - depends on AUDIT && (X86 || PARISC || PPC || S390 || IA64 || UML || SPARC64 || SUPERH || (ARM && AEABI && !OABI_COMPAT)) >>>>> + depends on AUDIT && (X86 || PARISC || PPC || S390 || IA64 || UML || SPARC64 || SUPERH || (ARM && AEABI && !OABI_COMPAT) || ARM64) >>>> >>>> The usual comment for such changes: could you please clean this up and >>>> just use something like "depends on HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL"? >>> >>> Do you agree to this change? >>> >>> If so, I can create a patch, but have some concerns: >>> 1) I can't verify it on other architectures than (arm &) arm64. >>> 2) Some architectures (microblaze, mips, openrisc) are not listed here, but >>> their ptrace.c have a call to audit_syscall_entry/exit(). >>> (audit_syscall_entry/exit are null if !AUDITSYSCALL, though) >> >> I can try: ppc s390 x86_64 ppc64 i686 s390x > > These arches above all pass compile and basic tests with the following patches applied: > > audit: correct a type mismatch in audit_syscall_exit() pending (already upstream) > > audit: Modify a set of system calls in audit class definitions (already upstream) > > [PATCH v3] audit: Add generic compat syscall support > > [PATCH v2] audit: Enable arm64 support > [PATCH v2] arm64: Add regs_return_value() in syscall.h > [PATCH v2] arm64: Add audit support > [PATCH v2] arm64: audit: Add 32-bit (compat) syscall support > [PATCH v2] arm64: audit: Add makefile rule to create unistd_32.h for compat syscalls > [PATCH v2] arm64: audit: Add audit hook in ptrace/syscall_trace
I think that you missed Catalin's suggestion. Please use the patch I will post after this message and try it again, please?
Thanks, -Takahiro AKASHI
>>> So I'm afraid that the change might break someone's assumption. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Takahiro AKASHI >> >> - RGB > > - RGB > > -- > Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com> > Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat > Remote, Ottawa, Canada > Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545 >
| |