Messages in this thread | | | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: Trusted kernel patchset for Secure Boot lockdown | Date | Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:52:42 +0000 |
| |
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 14:03 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> Ok, which tree should take this? I'm happy to, although most of it is > outside security/ .
Security might make the most sense - I don't think any of the additional restrictions (beyond kexec, and I think we've hashed that argument out now) are terribly controversial.
-- Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
| |