Messages in this thread | | | From | Kevin Hilman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform | Date | Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:03:10 -0800 |
| |
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> writes:
> On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> wrote: > >> Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> writes: >> >>> Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be >>> multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board >>> support that will not transition over to multiplatform. >>> >>> As part of this, we move support for MSM8X60, MSM8960 and MSM8974 over >>> to mach-qcom. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> >> >> Having a closer look at this after seeing the multi_v7_defconfig change, >> I have a minor nit on the new ARCH_QCOM name. >> >> For new additions, we've been trying to move towards using SOC_foo >> instead of ARCH_foo. Any reason not to do that here also? >> >> Kevin > > No reason, just wasn’t aware and no one said anything til now.
Yeah, sorry for not reviewiing sooner.
> Hmm, how to handle this now, can we do this as a 3.16 cleanup?
Yes, we've already merged it, so doing it as a cleanup should be fine.
Thanks,
Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |