lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform
Date
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> writes:

> On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>> Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be
>>> multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board
>>> support that will not transition over to multiplatform.
>>>
>>> As part of this, we move support for MSM8X60, MSM8960 and MSM8974 over
>>> to mach-qcom.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Having a closer look at this after seeing the multi_v7_defconfig change,
>> I have a minor nit on the new ARCH_QCOM name.
>>
>> For new additions, we've been trying to move towards using SOC_foo
>> instead of ARCH_foo. Any reason not to do that here also?
>>
>> Kevin
>
> No reason, just wasn’t aware and no one said anything til now.

Yeah, sorry for not reviewiing sooner.

> Hmm, how to handle this now, can we do this as a 3.16 cleanup?

Yes, we've already merged it, so doing it as a cleanup should be fine.

Thanks,

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-27 00:41    [W:0.172 / U:1.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site