Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:21:51 +0000 | | From | One Thousand Gnomes <> | | Subject | Re: Trusted kernel patchset for Secure Boot lockdown |
| |
> > kernel was trusted - untrusted userspace could have set it on an untrusted > > kernel, but by the same metric an untrusted kernel could just set it itself. > > > > If people object to this name then I swear to god that I will open a poll > > on Phoronix to decide the next attempt and you will like that even less.
Go on open the poll - I dare you. But don't be shocked if it ends up being called "Eric" or "Icanhazsigs" 8)
> For the Chrome OS use-case, it might be better described as "untrusted > userspace", but that seems unfriendly. :) The "trusted kernel" name > seems fine to me.
Trusted is rather misleading. It's not trusted, it's *measured*.
It's the same bits you had when you made it, and when you booted it before. Whether you trust them is a different and quite unrelated question. You may have reasons to do either.
Alan
|  |