[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 5/6] timerfd: Add support for deferrable timers
On 02/20/2014 08:23 AM, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> From: Anton Vorontsov <>
> This patch implements a userland-side API for generic deferrable timers,
> per linux/timer.h:
> * A deferrable timer will work normally when the system is busy, but
> * will not cause a CPU to come out of idle just to service it; instead,
> * the timer will be serviced when the CPU eventually wakes up with a
> * subsequent non-deferrable timer.
> These timers are crucial for power saving, i.e. periodic tasks that want
> to work in background when the system is under use, but don't want to
> cause wakeups themselves.

Please don't. This API sucks for all kinds of reasons:

- Why is it a new kind of clock?
- How deferrable is deferrable?
- It adds new core code, which serves no purpose (the problem is
already solved).

On the other hand, if you added a fancier version of timerfd_settime
that could explicitly set the slack value (or, equivalently, the
earliest and latest allowable times), that could be quite useful.

It's often bugged me that timer slack is per-process.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-26 04:41    [W:0.099 / U:3.676 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site