lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched: put rq's sched_avg under CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
On 25/02/14 13:16, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>> The struct sched_avg of struct rq is only used in case group
>> scheduling is enabled inside __update_tg_runnable_avg() to update
>> per-cpu representation of a task group. I.e. that there is no need to
>> maintain the runnable avg of a rq in the !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case.
>>
>> This patch guards struct sched_avg of struct rq and
>> update_rq_runnable_avg() with CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.
>>
>
> While this patch looks good, I see fields in sched_avg viz decay_count,
> last_runnable_update, load_avg_contrib only relevant to sched_entity.
> i.e they don't seem to be updated or used for rq->avg. Should we look at
> splitting sched_avg so that rq->avg doesn't have unwanted fields?

Yes, AFAICS at least load_avg_contrib and decay_count are only relevant
for struct sched_entity whereas last_runnable_update is used in
__update_entity_runnable_avg() itself.

By having struct sched_avg embedded into struct sched_entity and struct
rq, __update_entity_runnable_avg() and __update_tg_runnable_avg() can be
used on both and moreover, all current members of struct sched_avg
belong logically together.

With this patch I was more interested in the fact that we do not have to
maintain the load avg for struct rq in a !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED system.

-- Dietmar

>
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> Srikar Dronamraju
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-25 19:21    [W:0.088 / U:61.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site